The world is hotting up and that's a fact |
A few thoughts on the UN Climate summit in New York.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said - "Climate
change is the defining issue of our times and now is the time for action."
The purpose of the 2014 Climate Summit was to raise
political momentum for a meaningful universal climate agreement in Paris in
2015 and to galvanize action in all countries to reduce emissions and build
resilience to the adverse impacts of climate change.
So what’s the problem?
The world emitted 28 billion tons of carbon in 1992 when
many world leaders gathered in Rio de Janeiro and agreed to do something about
it. This year we are likely to emit 40 billion tons.
The Arctic ice cap had an average thickness of 16.6 feet in
1976, but now it averages 2.6 feet.
The distance from the North Pole to the sea is now just 350
miles – the shortest distance ever recorded.
Sea levels are expected to rise between 7 and 23 inches by
the end of the century.
Seven of the eight warmest years on record have occurred
since 2001 and the 10 warmest years have all occurred since 1995.
97% of climate scientists—the experts in their field—agree
that human activities are causing the current warming.
Very rarely would I quote an actor on a subject such as
this, however, I thought that Leonardo DiCaprio made an interesting point in
his speech at the Summit. ”As an actor I pretend for a living. I play fictitious
characters often solving fictitious problems. I believe humankind has looked at
climate change in that same way: as if it were a fiction, happening to someone
else’s planet, as if pretending that climate change wasn't real would somehow
make it go away”.
So with these sorts of words and facts being bandied around –
has this summit really come up with something that the world leaders can work towards, sign
and act upon at the Paris summit next year?
Well, you might imagine that Scott Barrett, a natural
resource economics professor at Columbia University's Earth Institute and
a former lead author of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, might be the person to ask.
Unfortunately, he is not convinced anything concrete will come out of the
Paris climate conference, despite the enthusiasm on display in New York. "The real problem is at the global level," said
Barrett. "We have not found the means to change the incentives to get the
countries to actually adopt limits, essentially on emissions."
"Unfortunately in the climate area, strategy is the
last thing that anyone is ever thinking of as far as I can see, because
they keep coming up with ideas like pledges which imply that you can, by some
kind of central planning, ordain a collective outcome and the world
doesn't work that way," he said.
"We've been doing this for 25 years and we've
failed for 25 years," he said. "We need to come up with newer
approaches, people don't want to repeat the past mistakes."
There is one bright spot, he noted however, in the effort to fight
climate change — the 1987 Montreal Protocol, an international treaty to
protect the ozone layer by phasing out chemical substances that deplete
it.
Those substances — chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) — are
also powerful greenhouse gases. The power of the Montreal
Protocol lies in the ability to ensure signatories follow the rules by
prohibiting certain trades with other member parties.
Since its implementation, the Montreal Protocol has reduced
CFCs by the equivalent of 135 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide.
So it can be done! I hope that there is no play acting at
the Paris summit in 2015 – but some real life, far reaching decisions made,
which are then consequently acted upon. We shall see.
No comments:
Post a Comment